Actor and former joint secretary of AMMA Ansiba Hassan gained a lot of momentum in his legal battle against a fellow actress Little Tom. The Ernakulam Judicial First Class Magistrate Court welcomed the criminal petition filed by Ansiba and asked the police to file an FIR and investigate the case as per her allegations. This decision was taken by the Court after Ansiba asked him for help because the police did not act on his previous complaints.
The court ordered the FIR after the police refused to register a case
This case stems from the allegations made by Ansiba against Tini Tom: about the statements he made, which were defamatory and of a common nature. As reported by English Mathrubhumi, Ansiba Haasan said that baseless allegations were made against him, such as calling him a “jihadi” and trying to convert Tini Tom’s driver to another religion. However, after conducting a preliminary inquiry and recording statements from the actors and office bearers of the Association of Malayalam Movie Artistes (AMMA), the police concluded that there was not enough material to register an FIR. Unhappy with the decision, Ansiba moved the magistrate’s court, which has now ordered the police to start a formal criminal investigation.
Blasphemy and communal allegations under investigation
Under the court order, the next phase of the process is the investigation. The police should file the FIR and look into all the allegations made in the complaint, including defamation and communal comments. The investigation process will also involve gathering more evidence and taking more statements from those related to the case.
The case has garnered attention within the Malayalam film industry
The development has generated a lot of interest among members of the Malayalam film fraternity as Ansiba Hassan and Tini Tom are popular industry figures associated with AMMA. The court’s decision is a landmark in the case as the issue has moved to the next level of investigation. At the beginning of the police investigation process, the emphasis is on the outcome.Disclaimer: The information in this report is based on a legal hearing as reported by a third-party source. The details provided represent allegations made by the parties involved and are not proven facts. The case is ongoing, and the final verdict has not yet been reached. The publication does not claim that the allegations are true.