In a recent development of ‘Kala Hiran. The Battle for Legacy court case, the: Delhi High Court postponed the hearing of Salman Khan:petition against the release of the film. The matter could not be resolved due to lack of time.
The hearing was adjourned by the Delhi High Court
According to an IANS report, the court adjourned the hearing and will hear the case on Friday. The case was listed before Justice Jyoti Singh. Earlier, the court issued a notice to the filmmaker Amit Jani and other respondents after Salman Khan sought relief against the release of the film.Salman Khan and his team approached the Delhi High Court claiming that the film is using his personality and life story without permission. They further suggested that the proposed film falsely portrays the events connected with him and violates his personality rights.
Salman Khan’s team statement
The ‘Maatrubhumi’ actor’s legal team further argued that the film took inspiration from his 1998 blackbuck poaching case and his alleged feud with gangster Lawrence Bishnoi. They approached the court to stop the release of the film.During the first hearing, Salman Khan’s lawyer, Nizam Pasha, told the court that the poster and trailer of the film have been released though the release date has not been announced.
What did the filmmakers say?
In response, the filmmakers opposed the request for immediate relief. Their lawyer told the court that they have not yet received the complete set of legal documents related to the case and asked for an exact copy before responding.Earlier, the court postponed the case without granting any interim relief. It directed Salman Khan’s legal team to provide the filmmakers with a complete copy of the case documents before the next hearing.Before moving the court, Salman Khan’s legal team also sent: legal notice: to the makers, asking them to stop releasing the film and to remove all promotional material, including posters and publicity content.Directed by Bharat S. Shrinet, the film is said to be a court drama and crime thriller.Disclaimer: The information in this report is based on a legal hearing as reported by a third-party source. The details provided represent allegations made by the parties involved and are not proven facts. The case is ongoing, and the final verdict has not yet been reached. The publication does not claim that the allegations are true.